• Coronavirus
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • World
  • More
    • Health
    • Education
    • Crime
    • Legal
    • Travel & Tourism
    • Lifestyle
    • Science & Technology
  • Entertainment & Arts
  • Our Radio Schedule
Sunday, January 18, 2026
  • Login
Plan B 104.5 FM
  • Coronavirus
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • World
  • More
    • Health
    • Education
    • Crime
    • Legal
    • Travel & Tourism
    • Lifestyle
    • Science & Technology
  • Entertainment & Arts
  • Our Radio Schedule
No Result
View All Result
  • Coronavirus
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • World
  • More
    • Health
    • Education
    • Crime
    • Legal
    • Travel & Tourism
    • Lifestyle
    • Science & Technology
  • Entertainment & Arts
  • Our Radio Schedule
No Result
View All Result
Plan B 104.5 FM
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Law against anal sex constitutional – Supreme Court declares

Deputy Speakers Can Vote While Presiding In Parliament – Supreme Court Rules
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Supreme Court has declared as constitutional the law which prohibits unnatural carnal knowledge such as anal sex. 

In a unanimous decision Wednesday [July 24, 2024], a seven-member panel of the court dismissed a writ challenging the constitutionality of  Section 104 (1) (b) of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29).

The court, presided over by Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie, did not read the full reasoning of the court, which it said would be deposited at the court’s registry.

The writ was filed by Dr Prince Obiri-Korang, a lecturer at the University of Ghana Law School.

British Council

Section 104 (1) (b) of Act 29 makes it a crime for any person to have unnatural carnal knowledge of a person who is 16 years and above even with his consent, with the crime described as a misdemeanour.

Section 104 (2) defines unnatural carnal knowledge as sex in an unnatural way or with an animal.

Dr Obiri-Korang, had argued in his writ that Section 104(1)(b) of Act was unconstitutional as it breached the right to privacy stipulated under Article 18 of the 1992 Constitution, right against discrimination under Article 17, and the protection personal liberties under Article 14.

Source: Graphic.com.gh
Previous Post

Man arrested after attempting to sell niece for GH¢ 150k to acquire a Canadian Visa

Next Post

COVID-19 vaccines not for free – Finance Ministry justifies Covid levy imposition

Related Posts

Politicians Have Hijacked The Importation Of ECG Meters – PUWU
News

Accountability for power: Eric Dawda invokes RTI Act to demand justification for rising utility tariffs

January 18, 2026
Majority Against The E-levy Are From NPP Strongholds – Dramani Dzramado
News

“Ofori-Atta has been moved from the Caroline Detention Centre”: Ambassador Smith discloses

January 18, 2026
Family Fumes As Dubai Firm Buries Nigerian Man Killed In Factory Accident Without Their Knowledge
News

Two engineers killed in bulldozer accident at ‘Big Push’ project in Ayensudo

January 17, 2026
Next Post
Vaccinated Persons Transmit Covid-19 More Than Non Vaccinated Persons- Research

COVID-19 vaccines not for free - Finance Ministry justifies Covid levy imposition

Discussion about this post

Listen LiVE

Plan B 104.5 FM

© 2021 Plan B 104.5 FM - All Rights Reserve. Powered. Unity Websoft.

Navigate Site

  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Coronavirus
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • World
  • More
    • Health
    • Education
    • Crime
    • Legal
    • Travel & Tourism
    • Lifestyle
    • Science & Technology
  • Entertainment & Arts
  • Our Radio Schedule

© 2021 Plan B 104.5 FM - All Rights Reserve. Powered. Unity Websoft.