Ablakwa lists 3 databases CHRAJ failed to check to prove Kusi Boateng’s ‘double identity’

North Tongu MP, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, has criticized the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) for exonerating Rev. Victor Kusi Boateng from allegations of holding a double identity, stating that the Commission failed to examine critical evidence from key institutional databases.Mr.

Ablakwa, in a Facebook post, accused CHRAJ of neglecting its investigative duty by overlooking records from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority (DVLA), the National Identification Authority (NIA), and the Electoral Commission (EC).He wrote, “CHRAJ failed to assess the database of the DVLA which confirms that Victor Kusi Boateng was issued a driver’s license in the name Victor Kusi Boateng.

CHRAJ failed to assess the database of the National Identification Authority which confirms that Victor Kusi Boateng’s Ghana Card was issued in the name Kwabena Adu Gyamfi.

“Highlighting discrepancies in electoral records, he added, “CHRAJ failed to assess the Electoral Commission’s database which confirms that Victor Kusi Boateng was issued a Voter’s ID as Victor Kusi Boateng in 2016 with Voter ID Number: 4863016954 at age 40 and issued another Voter ID in 2020 with the name Kwabena Adu Gyamfi indicating his age as 50 years (curiously he grew by 10 years within 4 years) — the 2020 Voter ID number is:

8907018142.”Mr. Ablakwa further referenced a High Court judgment from July 2023, in which the court dismissed a case brought against him by Rev. Kusi Boateng, with the judge stating that the cleric’s conduct “borders on criminality.

”He questioned the logic of CHRAJ’s findings, saying, “How does CHRAJ’s claim that Victor Kusi Boateng possesses one passport in a different name (Kwabena Adu Gyamfi) whose date of birth is different from his Victor Kusi Boateng date of birth clear the double identity champion? Desperate propagandists must respect the intelligence of Ghanaians.

“The lawmaker described the Commission’s report as a “ridiculous whitewash” and expressed disappointment in its failure to preserve credibility by addressing all aspects of the allegations comprehensively.