• Coronavirus
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • World
  • More
    • Health
    • Education
    • Crime
    • Legal
    • Travel & Tourism
    • Lifestyle
    • Science & Technology
  • Entertainment & Arts
  • Our Radio Schedule
Sunday, May 25, 2025
  • Login
Plan B 104.5 FM
  • Coronavirus
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • World
  • More
    • Health
    • Education
    • Crime
    • Legal
    • Travel & Tourism
    • Lifestyle
    • Science & Technology
  • Entertainment & Arts
  • Our Radio Schedule
No Result
View All Result
  • Coronavirus
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • World
  • More
    • Health
    • Education
    • Crime
    • Legal
    • Travel & Tourism
    • Lifestyle
    • Science & Technology
  • Entertainment & Arts
  • Our Radio Schedule
No Result
View All Result
Plan B 104.5 FM
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Law against anal sex constitutional – Supreme Court declares

Deputy Speakers Can Vote While Presiding In Parliament – Supreme Court Rules
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Supreme Court has declared as constitutional the law which prohibits unnatural carnal knowledge such as anal sex. 

In a unanimous decision Wednesday [July 24, 2024], a seven-member panel of the court dismissed a writ challenging the constitutionality of  Section 104 (1) (b) of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29).

The court, presided over by Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie, did not read the full reasoning of the court, which it said would be deposited at the court’s registry.

The writ was filed by Dr Prince Obiri-Korang, a lecturer at the University of Ghana Law School.

British Council

Section 104 (1) (b) of Act 29 makes it a crime for any person to have unnatural carnal knowledge of a person who is 16 years and above even with his consent, with the crime described as a misdemeanour.

Section 104 (2) defines unnatural carnal knowledge as sex in an unnatural way or with an animal.

Dr Obiri-Korang, had argued in his writ that Section 104(1)(b) of Act was unconstitutional as it breached the right to privacy stipulated under Article 18 of the 1992 Constitution, right against discrimination under Article 17, and the protection personal liberties under Article 14.

Source: Graphic.com.gh
Previous Post

Man arrested after attempting to sell niece for GH¢ 150k to acquire a Canadian Visa

Next Post

COVID-19 vaccines not for free – Finance Ministry justifies Covid levy imposition

Related Posts

Is It KLM Racism Or Ghanaian Inferiority Complex?
News

GACL Debunks Allegations Of Safety Breaches At KIA

May 24, 2025
17yr-old Boy Dies After Being Struck By lightning At Ho Bankoe
News

Woman, 35, Dies After Being Struck By Lightning In Ho

May 24, 2025
Mahama appoints A.B. A. Fuseini as Head of Corporate Affairs of Hajj Taskforce
News

Two Lives Lost, Five Pilgrims Deported During Hajj – Ghana Hajj Taskforce

May 24, 2025
Next Post
Vaccinated Persons Transmit Covid-19 More Than Non Vaccinated Persons- Research

COVID-19 vaccines not for free - Finance Ministry justifies Covid levy imposition

Discussion about this post

ON Air

Listen LiVE

UP Next

Plan B 104.5 FM

© 2021 Plan B 104.5 FM - All Rights Reserve. Powered. Unity Websoft.

Navigate Site

  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Coronavirus
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • World
  • More
    • Health
    • Education
    • Crime
    • Legal
    • Travel & Tourism
    • Lifestyle
    • Science & Technology
  • Entertainment & Arts
  • Our Radio Schedule

© 2021 Plan B 104.5 FM - All Rights Reserve. Powered. Unity Websoft.