Speaking on The Probe, Mohammed argued that the unease among those in power has little to do with concerns about the democratic process and more to do with political interests and personal alignments. He suggested that Baba Jamal’s close association with senior National Democratic Congress (NDC) figure Johnson Asiedu Nketia may be at the heart of the discomfort.
According to Mohammed, Baba Jamal is widely regarded in political circles as being closely linked to Asiedu Nketia, a highly influential personality within the NDC. He implied that this connection may have made Jamal’s victory unsettling for some within government circles.
In Mohammed’s view, the issue is not necessarily about how the election was conducted, but rather about who emerged victorious and the political influence that comes with that mandate. He said the outcome may be seen as empowering a particular faction within the NDC, which could explain the reported displeasure.
Mohammed added that the situation highlights the intense rivalries that continue to define Ghana’s political environment, where personal loyalties and alliances often carry as much weight as policies. He noted that electoral victories are sometimes judged not just by the process, but by the individuals involved.
Despite these concerns, Mohammed stressed that the choice of delegates must be respected. He emphasized that internal party elections reflect grassroots decisions and should stand regardless of external reactions, describing the episode as yet another reminder of how competitive and emotionally charged party politics can be when influential figures are involved.
Discussion about this post